Geoff Krasnov offers apparel/clothing/garment manufacturing and sourcing news.

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

IMPORT OR DOMESTIC APPAREL SOURCING - WHICH IS FOR ME?

We are commonly asked for "made in USA apparel" under the buyers belief that apparel made in USA is a strong selling point. Although it warms our heart to find the made in USA sentiment often sways potential buyers direction, it is usually followed by the reality of pricing and competitive position concerns. At www.style-source.com you will find a basic chart that compares relative advantages and disadvantages to making clothing in USA versus overseas.

Aside from the emotional considerations, the next major concern we address is where to place the products. Factors that come into play are quantities, lead times, reliability, quality expectations, freight costs, political climate, availability of textiles, transit time, and labor costs. You will find that custom apparel manufacturing runs minimums of at least 1200 units per style as an opening order, and discounting is not usually a consideration for quantities less than 5,000 garments.

Domestic apparel production has been facing a double edged sword. First, USA labor averages in the $10-$12 per hour range versus rates as low as $.40 (Haiti). Bear in mind these rates affect the textiles, the findings (elastics zippers etc) as well as apparel assembly. This can be somewhat offset by manufacturing lower labor items as well as by utilizing technology and efficiencies. The second issue is far more ominous. With the decline of apparel manufacturing the infrastructure has begun to crumble. Findings such as buttons and snaps and zippers are no longer produced in this country and custom apparel manufacturing often requires custom trims. Subsequently, the minimums have increased and lead times have become extended. Additionally, US textiles have never been known for diversity, especially in the more "European" influenced fabrics. Textile mills have been closing at an unprecedented pace, leaving fewer and fewer to service the sector. Those surviing mills face irregular demand, forcing them to cut their labor force. Topping it off is the fact that energy accounts for a large percentage of a mills overall costs, and this has forced them to run less shifts or less days in attempts to lower consumption by shutting down boilers. When demand peaks these understaffed mills cannot respond fast enough, and deliveries suffer both from a timing and quality perspective.

The companies that specialize in domestic clothing manufacturing are dwindling. Those that remain must be extremely agile, must maintain a broad sourcing network, must maintain an extremely efficient/ low overhead structure, and must constantly be ready with alternative approaches to successfully service domestic private label apparel and custom apparel manufacturing requirements.

4 Comments:

Blogger Hong Xiaowan said...

HELLO

3:44 PM

 
Blogger DressThatMan.com said...

Thanks for writing this informative article! While we would ideally like to work exclusively with manufacturers and sources in developing our new branded clothing line within the USA, the cost is prohibitive and the manufacturers along with sources in the USA are indeed dwindling. The unfortunate reality is that the USA cannot possibly compete with the cheaper labor associated with import sourcing. Our biggest concern in developing our brand is in the QUALITY and consistency of garments produced.

3:06 PM

 
Blogger rwag said...

The Los Angeles area has a huge number of contractors available, but I agree that the infrastructure is failing. Also the management of all the materials, QC, deliveries, etc. is overwhelming for a small business, not to mention the permits needed to insure that you are doing business legally in California. If you are the sewer, your permit costs $300. annually if you are the person contracting the sewing it ranges from $700 + .. The people having goods sewn get penalized by the state , when it's the actual contractor that is hiring undocumented workers and not paying them well in some cases. The state has put the responsibility on the people who buy the goods to be sure the workers that are not even employed by them get paid properly! I understand why this all came about, but it also is hurting small CA businesses, who are forced to pay for workplace inspections at all of their contractors 2-4 X per year to stay in compliance.

3:57 PM

 
Blogger Unknown said...


Thank you for sharing excellent and useful informations. Your blog post is very nice.I’m impressed by the details that you have on this web site.

Boiler Scheme

6:09 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home